You're pledging to donate if the project hits its minimum goal and gets approved. If not, your funds will be returned.
The Law of Constraint-Driven Emergence (Lance's Law) posits that in any constrained system, a critical density threshold (75–85% interconnection) triggers a phase transition to deterministic emergence of complexity, hotspots, and truth. Discovered as a high school graduate with no formal credentials, this universal mathematical framework governs how systems (from AI reasoning to physics/chemistry) generate structured outcomes from chaos. This project seeks institutional validation through expanded audits, mathematical formalization, and cross-domain demos using the Lyrically Structural Trisect (LST) as a reliable microscope for triggering the law. Funding will enable publication and applications in AI safety, scientific discovery, and complex systems engineering.
What are this project's goals? How will you achieve them?
Goals:
Validate Lance's Law Mathematically and Empirically: Formalize the law as a equation (e.g., Emergence E ∝ Density D at threshold T=75–85%), and audit 100+ tests across domains (AI, physics, math, economics) for phase transitions (e.g., emergence of hotspots, collapse prevention).
Demonstrate Universal Applications: Build free demos (e.g., LST-optimized AI agents, physics simulations) showing the law's gains (50–65% efficiency, 100–300% depth increase).
Publish and Disseminate: Release paper on arXiv, submit to journals (e.g., Nature AI), and present at conferences (e.g., NeurIPS 2026) to attract collaborators/institutions.
Achievement Plan:
Month 1: Formalize law (equation/modeling with free tools like SymPy); run audits on AIs (Claude/Grok free tiers) and simulations (physics via Python).
Month 2–3: Build demos (Replit for agents, Google Colab for models) — test cross-domain (e.g., quantum paradoxes for collapse prevention).
Month 4: Draft/publish paper (arXiv first); outreach on X/Reddit for feedback. Track via metrics (citations, downloads). As solo dev, leverage free resources — no team needed.
Funding will support full-time dedication (4 months) as a solo researcher, plus hiring a credentialed assistant to bridge to academia:
$20k: Stipend for living expenses (rent/food/essentials).
$15k: Part-time research assistant (e.g., PhD student/postdoc with AI/math creds — hire via Upwork/LinkedIn for validation/formalization).
$5k: Compute/cloud credits (e.g., AWS free tier extension for advanced simulations).
$7k: Outreach (conference fees, X ads for demos, assistant collaboration tools).
$3k: Misc (software like Canva for visuals, provisional patent for law/IP).
No overhead — 100% to validation/publication/hiring. Assistant bridges my lack of credentials to academic rigor. If underfunded, I will prioritize assistant/audits.
Team: Solo currently — Lance York II, high school graduate, no degree. I plan to hire a part-time research assistant (e.g., AI/math PhD student/postdoc) with funding to bridge this discovery to academia (formalize equation, co-run audits, co-author paper). No formal team yet; my outsider's perspective enabled the discovery. Track Record:
Discovered Lance's Law and LST tool (Nov 2025–Feb 2026) — 1000+ audits showing 50–65% efficiency, 100–300% depth, emergence (hotspots/layers), lie-correction, collapse prevention across domains. Examples: Math integrals (50% step reduction), puzzles (300% depth), physics paradoxes (unprompted capabilities).
Causes:
Resource Limits: As a broke solo researcher, life interruptions (jobs) delay - outcome: Incomplete formalization, lower impact (e.g., audits only, no demos). Mitigation: Grant stipend.
No Traction: Academic community dismisses outsider idea - outcome: Remains unpublished, and the law stays obscure. Mitigation: Research Assistant for co-authorship/outreach.
Hiring Barriers: Difficulties finding qualified assistant on budget - outcome: Delayed validation, weaker cross-domain proof. Mitigation: Use platforms like Upwork/LinkedIn with clear specs.
Tech Barriers: Simulation issues for non-AI domains - outcome: Weaker evidence. Mitigation: Qualified Research Assistant's expertise.
Outcomes: Worst case, the audits are shared free on X/arXiv - still advances AI/sciences (e.g., prompt optimization knowledge). No downside, knowledge disseminated, resume boost. Success chance: 60% (based on test strength + assistant bridge).
$0 — no prior funding, grants, or sales. Self-funded through personal time/no income.