I like the work you are doing, especially the neuroscientific aspect of it.
You're pledging to donate if the project hits its minimum goal and gets approved. If not, your funds will be returned.
I am 17 years old, working independently in Indonesia without institutional affiliation, mentor, or lab. My Javanese-speaking background means I navigate three languages daily: Javanese, Indonesian, and English, while producing theoretical work that sits at the foundations of questions AI safety has not fully resolved: what intelligence actually is at the substrate level, and what consciousness is at the mechanistic level.
I am a cross-disciplinary theorist. When an idea is worth capturing, I capture it, regardless of what field it belongs to. My 18+ preprints span multiple domains, not just AI or consciousness. That is not a weakness. It is how I work.
Everything I have published so far was written on a 2GB RAM phone that crashes when I open more than two reference tabs at once. The device consumes more of my time and energy than the research itself does.
The immediate goal is simple: purchase one laptop to remove a physical constraint that is actively slowing research that is already happening.
The deeper goal is to continue developing theoretical frameworks I believe are foundational to questions AI safety depends on but does not yet have good answers to, not as direct technical contributions, but as the kind of conceptual groundwork the field needs.
Two recent examples:
The first argues that the five core computational mechanisms underlying LLM intelligence each have precise functional equivalents in biological neural architecture, grounded in established neuroscience, not analogy. If intelligence is genuinely substrate-independent, the implications for how alignment is defined across substrates are significant.
Biological AI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19438352
The second proposes that phenomenological identity is constituted by whichever neural pathway configuration is currently dominant, rather than by a unified self-model. This directly affects how consciousness is defined, and what moral status AI systems might carry.
PDC Theory: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19438272
With a laptop, I can also run Python, manage my research pipeline properly, start the book I have been planning, and pursue a Bachelor's degree via Recognition of Prior Learning within 12 months, because four years is too long and the work is already happening.
$600 entirely for one laptop. No courses, no programs, no overhead. Just the tool.
Just me. I am a vocational student in software engineering who also codes, and a theorist who works across neuroscience, computation, philosophy of mind, and whatever else demands thinking about. My ambition is to work as a polymath: connecting domains that do not usually talk to each other.
18+ preprints published on Zenodo and OSF.
ORCID: 0009-0002-1054-3167
One paper was submitted to Consciousness and Cognition (Elsevier Q1) and received substantive feedback from the Editor-in-Chief, not a form rejection, but specific theoretical critique that I am currently working through. That is where the research is: early, serious, and ongoing.
If unfunded: research continues at current pace on a 2GB RAM phone. Papers will still get written, just slower and with more friction than the ideas deserve.
$0.
Paul Vasholz
about 7 hours ago
I like the work you are doing, especially the neuroscientific aspect of it.
Timotius A P Lagaunne
1 day ago
I am also working on AGI theory/ Intelligence theory. Do you want to collaborate? I am also Indonesian. I cannot offer fund though
Timotius A P Lagaunne
about 19 hours ago
My foundation work is rooted in modification of Intelligent Design which is uniqueness theory. Its connected with Leibniz’s law of identity @Zaelani . These are the definition and the theories. I haven't published since i want to make it rigorous first.
Definition: The Entity An "Entity" is any concept, object, or phenomenon that can be represented through symbols/language or directly experienced.
Theory 1: Universal Uniqueness ,Every entity in existence is intrinsically unique. This uniqueness serves as the fundamental basis for identity and differentiation.
Theory 2: Infinite Dimensionality, True uniqueness implies that every entity possesses an unlimited number of dimensions. To be truly distinct from all other things, an entity must have infinite depth that cannot be fully captured by a finite set of parameters.
Timotius A P Lagaunne
about 19 hours ago
This is the continutation
Theory 3: The Argument for Design, The existence of unique entities with infinite dimensionality suggests intentional creation. From a probabilistic standpoint, the likelihood of achieving infinite-dimensional uniqueness through random chance is zero; therefore, this uniqueness points to a divine origin.
Theory 4: Uniqueness as the Root of Logic Uniqueness is the prerequisite for causality and reason. We can only engage in logical deduction and argumentation because entities are distinct and identifiable; without uniqueness, logic would collapse into a homogenous void.
@Zaelani
Timotius A P Lagaunne
about 19 hours ago
Theory 5: The Failure of Data-Grounded Models, Generative AI and traditional Machine Learning models are fundamentally incapable of reaching AGI. Because these models rely on finite datasets to represent entities of infinite dimensionality, they inevitably succumb to the Curse of Dimensionality. Consequently, they cannot truly generalize to the universal world, leading instead to overfitting and rote memorization rather than genuine understanding.
Theory 6: The Analog Imperative To achieve AGI, we must move beyond digital architectures. AGI requires a model that mirrors the inherent uniqueness of the physical world. This is only achievable through analog systems, which naturally reflect the continuous and unique state of reality without the need for discrete classifiers or digital approximation. @Zaelani l