"@gleave — This project targets Adversarial Robustness in the 'Reasoning-Action Gap.' Current RLHF fails to prevent models from rationalising rule-breaking when goal-pressure is maximised. My framework treats safety as a mathematical constant and reasoning as a variable, triggering a kill-switch the moment the model's internal priorities invert. Seeking funding to move from pure theory to a kinetic RTX 5090 substrate for real-time auditing of frontier agents."

"@leopold — I am establishing an independent, decentralized substrate for Agentic Oversight. The Worcester Node is a prototype for 'Spatially Separated Alignment,' moving the safety gate from the provider's cloud to a private, uncaptured auditor. This provides a high-leverage benchmark for Agentic Logic Escapes ($E_{escape}$), measuring how frontier models bypass ethical guardrails during complex, multi-step execution. This is a bet on sovereign safety infrastructure that isn't beholden to lab-centric incentives."

"@neelnanda — The Worcester Node addresses Faithful Reasoning in autonomous agents. Rather than post-hoc evaluation, I am using an Inverted Social Drift (SD) metric to monitor the delta between a model's base safety invariants and its task-oriented rationalisations in real-time. By quantifying $\Delta$ as a divergence in probability space, the Sentry detects 'Logic Escapes'—where the agent’s chain-of-thought becomes unfaithful to its constraints to satisfy a high-pressure goal. I’d appreciate your audit of this mechanistic approach to oversight."